.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

...a sweatshop of moxie

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

Why are We Afraid of Benedict XVI?

(Welcome Tim Worstall & OC Chronicle blog readers. If you have seen other links to this blogpost, please let me know. I'll leave the post up until Friday)

(And a very belated welcome to the readers of the Anchoress, who featured on her blog, the blogpiece you will read below, on 2 August 2005)

If Pope John Paul II had lived exactly 2 years and 14 days more than what he did, we would never have heard of Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger's transformation into Pope Benedict XVI. He would've been disqualified to vote for the new Pope, and thereto, perhaps to be Pope due to being 80 years old.

A pretty sobering fact when put that way, isn't it? As I said earlier, timing is everything.

It struck me as I watched his recent Installation this Sunday as Pope, of which this is a blog recap, but not only of that majestic ceremony, but of the almost month-long treatment of the illness, death and funeral of the late Polish Pontiff, and thereto Conclave, Election, and Installation of the new German Pope.

As you have no doubt noted, this seminal event made a tremendous impact on my daily life, and though I am loath to leave it entirely, my personality, of which my blog is a reflection, is too eclectic to sustain one topic for too long. So it's time to move on.

But not before I conclude with a rather long, but I hope, guilessly transparent wrap-up.


If you're like me, you wonder why certain things happen in life -- such as why we meet the people we do, of all the people, of all time that we could have met, millions and millions of years, billions and billions of people, and you got to sit next to stinky Sherman Kaplan in Brooklyn during all of 3rd grade.

This is mindboggling to me. God may not play dice, but grade schools certainly do.

A lot of people attribute these events to the mysterious and unknowable mind of God, whose ultimate plan for the history of the world will presumably not be revealed until the moment of the earth's extinction, and therefore ours. It's a heady thought, since it's a nirvana which may last a second only.

But quick as a flash this past Sunday, I felt for a brief moment that I had peeked into the mind of the Deity. Ah, vanity - thy name really is woman.

Let me walk you through it.


I'm tired of moaning publicly of the treatment given this nascent Papacy by Mainstream Media. You can read what I have to say about that here, here and here. Such moaning hasn't been heard without Ron Jeremy being present, in years.

Since I've been quick to assign bias to MSM, let me also be brisk in heaping praise where it's due.

If you were privileged to watch the Installation on CBS, a network I usually dislike, you were lucky to witness Canadian journalist John Roberts (in sporting terms, the "play-by-play" guy), and guest analysts Fr. John Robichaud (the "colour" guy), Msgr. Robert Wister (the sideline "mic guy"), and CBS Rome/Vatican beat reporter, Allen Pizzey (the "suit").

Their coverage was exceptional. I cannot state that enough.

They were able to combine objectivity with deference, interest without fawning, secularism with religiosity, in a way I have rarely seen on American media.

But the highest praise must go to the lady translator, who seemlessly wove her voice with that of the Pope's during his dazzling Homily. What a voice. What delivery. What depth of feeling.

As her voice broke during one passage, I felt tears come to my eyes, so completely and startingly overwhelming me, that I had to catch myself, as one would during a weepy in the cinemas.

I haven't found out who that lady was yet, but I owe her the sense of closure I feel today about the whole event, since it was partly due to her mellifluous voice that I feel, "it's enough". It often happens that way, as tears can be cathartic like few things can.


I am an observer of the scene, and as such, I tend to focus on little things, on the inconsequential details of life. I am in love with descriptions, which simply add colour to the world around us, but they don't amount to a hill of beans otherwise.

For those of you who remember my "Christiane Amanpour was the only news network reporter wearing all-white on the day of the Pope's funeral; everyone else was in deepest black" observation, you'll instantly recognise what I mean by this above.

(As an aside, ole Christiane was one of the few wearing deep black for the Installation, as if she were in mourning. Odd that)

So in this vein, some of the details I observed were:

  • Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, born 1921, and thus only 1 year younger than the late Pope, represented the Queen at the ceremony. He looked, as ever, handsome, elegant, and quite uninterested in the goings-on.

  • The King and Queen of Spain have now taken the reins from the British Royal Couple as far as social cachet is concerned, and are the guests of honour which all eyes focus on in these events. The Queen was wearing her usual towering Peineta (ornamental comb) and Mantilla (lace veil), in radiant white, signifying the end of official mourning for John Paul II. They were the ones who everyone wanted to shake hands with and talk to. The Queen was also seen reading the translation of the Homily with avid interest, never once lifting up her head to gape around her, like the King did.

  • The Grand Duke and Duchess of Luxembourg were the other highest ranking members of a ruling family there, as Prince Albert II of Monaco's reign is too young for consideration, and the King of Sweden is Protestant. Maria Teresa, the Grand Duchess, was born in Cuba, and exiled as a child to Switzerland. She was also dressed in white, with a more discrete veil than Queen Sofia's, but well turned out in Oscar de la Renta nonetheless.

  • Fr. Georg Ratzinger was not seated with the governing VIPs, but rather in the first row of the Roman Catholic Church VIP section, slightly to the right of the grandstand. I don't know if you've noticed this, but every time I see him, he looks resentful to the point of jealousy of his brother, and when the new Pope got into his new, open-air PopeMobile at the end of the ceremony, he barely clapped at him going by. When asked what he would say to the Pope upon meeting him after the ceremony, he said, "For his direct telephone number". I think the Castel Gandolfo operators would put him through to be honest.

And finally, I've now seen the Pope several times. Enough to say how sweet, retiring, and shy he is -- and very genuine.

He laughs during his speeches, he shyly acknowledges cheers, looking a bit disconcerted at all the fuss about him, and he also uses his hands a lot, in that South German way which Italians will love, especially during his Homily. By the way, he has the hands of a banker: smooth, unlined, lily-white.

That enormous Papal Ring seemed to fall off his feminine tapered fingers.

The hands of a 78 year-old man?

Though I haven't been able to find the official invited guest list for the Installation, I note that at least Gerhard Schröder and wife could make it, and though, as I saw on MSNBC immediately after his PopeMobile ride, they were the first to greet him in the conga line of dignitaries, Schröder looked decidedly uncomfortable, and gave the Papst the merest of moments of his time. His wife was a little more enthusiastic, at least. Here's the full-funeral attendees list on Wikipedia.


Was a masterstroke.

Once again you got the sense that this Pontiff writes his own speeches, because it conveyed his particular personality without sounding forced: erudite, philosophical, a past master of Church customs and doctrines.

Once in a lifetime, you sit down to write everything which has been percolating inside you your whole life. You unite all that you have learned, and join that to all you believe in.

And when that happens, you get a genius of a written piece. This is what the Homily sounded like.

It's not easy to condense 35 minutes of a speech (of which there were over 30 pauses for applause, really quite extraordinary when you think of it), but here are some of the finest phrases I remember, with my comments in between them.

They are very much the Holy Father's Highlights.

"And now, at this moment, weak servant of God that I am, I must assume this enormous task, which truly exceeds all human capacity. How can I do this? How will I be able to do it?"

He opened his speech in exactly the same tone with which he used during John Paul II's funeral homily -- in that coversational tone which strips away pretentious jargon, and reaches in deep inside you.

For anyone who has been a public speaker, you know this is a very difficult thing to do: to personalise yourself to your audience by lowering that unseen curtain which separates you from your listener.

He achieved this by a simple rhetorical device, as if speaking aloud more to himself, than to anyone specific. Magnificent.

"Yes, the Church is alive – this is the wonderful experience of these days. During those sad days of the Pope’s illness and death, it became wonderfully evident to us that the Church is alive. And the Church is young!"

He shouted "giovane!" and the rows and rows of youthful observers let out a huge cheer of surprise.

Yes, that is the one thing we all of us took away from this month-long Catholic orgy. The Church may have retreated in the 1960's-1970's, but here come the Millenial Generation, who grew up under John Paul's ministry.

The final chapter hasn't been written on the Catholic Church, yet. I suppose this is what so many who wish it had, resent.

"At this moment there is no need for me to present a programme of governance."

Another loud cheer from the crowd. Smart move. This is the part which the press is dying to hear, because then they can lynch him like they do politicians. They attack their specific "points of light".

So instead of dogma, he gave us divinity. How certain people must hate him for not falling into their traps so early.

"The first symbol is the Pallium, woven in pure wool, which will be placed on my shoulders. [..], may be considered an image of the yoke of Christ. [...] The symbolism of the Pallium is even more concrete: the lamb’s wool is meant to represent the lost, sick or weak sheep which the shepherd places on his shoulders and carries to the waters of life. [...] The human race – every one of us – is the sheep lost in the desert which no longer knows the way."

His knowledge of Catholic traditions and customs is so deep, that he can synthesise them in simple visual language, ex-professor that he is.

But more than that, as you can see below, his vision of his faith is layered. Deeply layered. And he's not afraid of uncovering those layers, as he unveils them step-by-step to you.

"...so many people are living in the desert. And there are so many kinds of desert. There is the desert of poverty, the desert of hunger and thirst, the desert of abandonment, of loneliness, of destroyed love."

You could hear the audience gasp when he got to "desert of destroyed love". What a haunting vision that is. The kind of love that you feel when there's nothing left to be said anymore.

"The symbol of the lamb also has a deeper meaning. In the Ancient Near East, it was customary for kings to style themselves shepherds of their people. This was an image of their power, a cynical image: to them their subjects were like sheep, which the shepherd could dispose of as he wished."

A frisson from the King of Spain, I thought.

"When the shepherd of all humanity, the living God, himself became a lamb, he stood on the side of the lambs"

This is it, really. This is what Jesus represents. One of us. And like one us, he died powerless, just like we would in that situation.

"How often we wish that God would make show Himself stronger, that He would strike decisively, defeating evil and creating a better world."

How many of us didn't utter that during the awful Tsunamis this past Christmas? Or when we read of the Holocaust? Or when you see a child born blind? All of us have at one point questioned why does God allow that, and why doesn't he do something about it?

"All ideologies of power justify themselves in exactly this way, they justify the destruction of whatever would stand in the way of progress and the liberation of humanity. We suffer on account of God's patience."


"At this point, my mind goes back to 22 October 1978, when Pope John Paul II began his ministry here in Saint Peter’s Square. His words on that occasion constantly echo in my ears: “Do not be afraid! Open wide the doors for Christ!” The Pope was addressing the mighty, the powerful of this world, who feared that Christ might take away something of their power if they were to let him in, if they were to allow the faith to be free. Yes, he would certainly have taken something away from them: the dominion of corruption, the manipulation of law and the freedom to do as they pleased."

As he said this passage, CBS split-screened the fabulously younger, vigourous John Paul II giving his Homily that October day, with his papers shaking as he shouted,


John Paul II made people less afraid, and that's why they loved him, and some feared him so. They were so afraid of his strength to free people from their mental prisons, that they tried to kill him.

"The world is redeemed by the patience of God. It is destroyed by the impatience of man."

An anti-war crowd nod, but equally, it could signify our hastiness in all facets of life, before we know their consequences.

"God, Who became a lamb, tells us that the world is saved by the Crucified One, not by those who crucified Him."

And this is the most important of all the quotes, since it implicitly asks you:

Who do you want to be associated with? Those who believe in love, gentleness, abnegation, or those who believe in lies, power, and fear?

"We are not some casual and meaningless product of evolution. Each of us is the result of a thought of God."

I'm sure the secularists of this world must be seething at this not-so-veiled anti-evolution, pro-life message.

"And the account of the 153 large fish ends with the joyful statement: 'although there were so many, the net was not torn' (Jn 21:11). Alas, beloved Lord, with sorrow we must now acknowledge that it has been torn! But no - we must not be sad!"

He acknowledges that the Church has its problems, and it has reached mass exodus in some areas. But nets can be mended.

"Are we not perhaps all afraid in some way? If we let Christ enter fully into our lives, if we open ourselves totally to him, are we not afraid that He might take something away from us?"

How haunting.

This is what all post-modern people, myself included, feel about rules and regulations: that it takes away your freedom by imposing limits to it. And we're just too used to having them.

"Are we not perhaps afraid to give up something significant, something unique, something that makes life so beautiful? Do we not then risk ending up diminished and deprived of our freedom? And once again the Pope said: No! If we let Christ into our lives, we lose nothing, nothing, absolutely nothing of what makes life free, beautiful and great."

I can't believe how honest he is. And how he answers his own question by giving us strength through our choice, if only we make it.


You know...after a month-long reassertion of what it means to be the Catholic Church, its mesmeric traditions, its grandiose liturgy, its vestments of Cardinals, its drama of ritual, its plethora of red sashes, curtains, balconies, litanies, gospels, cantors, on and on and on, in an assault of the ancient into the ultra-modern, I'm a bit scared.

Scared people will go to their Churches next Sunday, maybe some after a decades-long absence, recharged and perhaps a bit curious, wanting to prolong that feeling of purpose they felt after a month of in-your-face-Catholicism, and expect this:

The Majesty

And get this.

Hey, where are the Cardinals?

Unless the Vatican happens to be your parish, temper your expectations.

The litany may not be sung, especially not in Latin. The priest may not be kindly, and in fact, may be rather stern. Worse, he may be boring. And the vestments and rituals may conform more to practical local custom, than to the glorious pageantry we've just witnessed.

Each one of us must face the reality of our churches, but knowing that for 400 years, there is a St. Peter's which awaits us when we grow weary of the drabness.


Why are we afraid of Benedict XVI, then?

Well to some he must be the worst incarnation of everything they thought they had defeated, or had been discredited in some way.

Tradition. Austerity. Self-control.

Where some offer judgementless self-help, he counters with intellectual spirituality.

Where some suggest primacy of the communal, he reminds us of the singular path to faith.

And where some want to have validated their philosophies, their achievements, their world views, he makes them realise they haven't achieved as much as they thought.

Worse than that, their prime of life is slipping away before they have had a real chance to change things. To reform, to reinvent, to make their own. It's clear to them, their window of opportunity is being shut. For the Me-Generation, he represents the ultimate They. The They long-since thought overcome.


It's difficult for me to write what I did above. I'm not religious. I don't know much more than the catechism I was taught for my First Communion and Confirmation. And I am not an historical apologist for the Church.

Even worse than all this is the evangelical zeal I feel is at the root of all Christianity, which needs to proselytise to gain converts. In fact, it's a prerequisite to be and stay a Christian.

I am simply too modern, and too set in my ways, to want to make others adhere to new ways.

I feel the imposition that they feel when people are preached at, and it bothers me. I could never, in this case, be a Born Again Christian, even if I had a religious transformation.

In short, preaching makes me shy, embarrassed, awkward.

But once in a blue moon, as I have done this past April, I am alive to the possibilities of my faith.

The kind of renewed interest you have when you meet an old friend after a long absence, and discover something new, perhaps a hitherto unknown area of interest which you can share now.

This is how Pope Benedict XVI makes me feel.

Some people would have been comforted with any choice the 115 Cardinals had made. Perhaps I would too, but since it belongs to those 'what-ifs' of history, I will never know for sure until the Pope dies.

What I myself needed was to understand my faith, a faith I am not alienated from like so many others are. But like many more others are, it has just been put in the backburner of my existence.

When you are a child, you put away childish things, goes the Scripture verse, and in a sense, I put my Catholicism in that cabinet of discarded toys.

As I grow older, fast approaching my 30th year on earth, I feel a need to make sense of life before it gets away from me.

So when I was a child, I loved John Paul II because of his reassuring friendly presence, like that cabinet of loved childhood wonders.

But now that I am an adult, I need something a little different -- something which explains to me what I thought I knew, but in reality, I didn't know anything about.

I don't know why Benedict XVI was chosen to be Pope. I can't scan the mind of God.

But in one instant I realise what those Cardinals understood in one day, that he was good for me, for others, for my Church, the perfect choice to succeed the late Pope, simply because he takes us into another path than our first teacher took us to, and yet, it's not that different a change, since it builds on what you already know, the product of its own journey.

What one gave was to shake away the half-sleep of childhood, by telling you not to be afraid of what will come, even though change is scary.

The other seems to take that faith, that strength already welled up inside you, and demystifies it so you can understand it for yourself.

What follows, none of us can predict, but at least you know, the choice has been yours for all the right reasons. After all...

First comes faith, then comes belief.


The Pope Blog
Benedict XVI Blog
Pope Benedict 16 Blog
E-Pope Benedict Blog
Pontifex Blog in German
Papst Benedikt in German (Belgium)
Papal Blog Spoof: Ask the Pope
Hardball Vatican Blogcast
Windows Media "Habemus Papam!"
George Weigel's Newsweek Article


  • 2 points Victoria ...
    1. According to Canon Law there is nothing to prevent the election of a man aged over 80 to the Papacy. Being aged over 80 makes you ineligible to be one of the Cardinal Electors who chose the Pope, but not to be the Pope. A common misconception.
    2. In your section about His Royal Highness the Duke of Edinburgh, you confuse the use of the word disinterested with uninterested. The former means 'unbiased as you have no vested interest in something' whereas the latter means 'showing lack of interest'. Another common (alas!) misconception.

    Great post though!!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 03:35:00 am GMT-4  

  • Ahh, a man or woman after my own half-German persnickety heart!

    That's fine, thank you so much for the corrections.

    I'll let the post stand as it is, with your notation when the readers click here. :)

    Thanks for reading it, and please correct anything and everything -- since that makes me a better writer!


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Thu Apr 28, 03:48:00 am GMT-4  

  • Also, thought you might like to know ...
    magestic (majestic), lilly-white (lily-white), Millenial (millennial), Cathlic (catholic), pavura (paura) and vigourous (vigorous)
    A really nice piece though!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 03:51:00 am GMT-4  

  • *LOL*

    Thanks a lot. I've gone ahead and corrected your first suggestions, but darn it, I must show my lack of infallibality somehow! ;)


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Thu Apr 28, 03:54:00 am GMT-4  

  • That was a great post. Took me a long time to read though! :) The only thing I have to say is that I disagree with you on your point about Pope Benedict's brother. His brother's sight is almost gone (he couldn't even see his brother being elected) and he looks quite frail. It could be, that after sitting in the sun for so long, he was tired.

    I think that, if anything, he is feeling disappointed that he could not spend the last years of his life with his dear brother. And he did defend the Pope against accusations made by the MSM that he was a Nazi. Anyways, just my 0.02


    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 04:11:00 am GMT-4  

  • Victoria,
    a well written and interesting piece. Like you, I am quite elated with the selection of the new Pope.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 04:19:00 am GMT-4  

  • Thanks for the reply, and sorry my piece taxed you, Maria. ;)

    Seriously though, it's more to do with a few things I've read by Father Georg, than just the split-second impression I got during the clapping. If you notice, he had on sunglasses, which he took off briefly, and then put them back on with a rather sour expression. (I told you I was an observer of the minute ;).

    His commentaries about his brother seem wistful, and though certainly he has defended his brother from the Nazi charges, there was a pugnaciousness about him regarding his brother I couldn't square (in a German language newspaper piece, as well as the NYT one).

    Thanks for your comments, Maria!


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Thu Apr 28, 04:20:00 am GMT-4  

  • Why can't MSM interview us, eh, AB01? ;)

    I have to say that before I saw him go into the crowd to cull impressions, I had rather liked CNN's homegrown Alessio Vinci.

    Then he phrased the questions to three pilgrims who were watching in the crowds, one a Spaniard, then two Germans, man and woman.

    They went something like:

    "Are you concerned this Pope will not address the problems affecting the Church?"


    "What things would you like to see changed?"

    Amongst other comments of that ilk.

    I am not a lawyer (although I play one on TV), but that to me are very much "leading questions" since it presupposes by their nature, dissatisfaction and anger.

    Of course, not that any bystanders CNN would choose would goosestep out of line.

    I wonder if they had screeners who canvassed the crowds --

    "Hey who wants to be on CNN?"


    "Are you happy with the Pope's election?"

    "Sure! I'm here, aren't I?".



    By Blogger vbspurs, at Thu Apr 28, 04:29:00 am GMT-4  

  • "According to this full-list on Wikipedia, Germany didn't send anyone, not even a junior cabinet minister to the funeral of John Paul II. Sehr interresant."

    That's all wrong.
    They were all there.
    Have a look at wikipedia:

    Horst Köhler (president)
    Gerhard Schröder (chancellor)
    Wolfgang Thierse (president of the pariament)
    Edmund Stoiber (prime minister of the state of Bavaria)

    missing at the wikipedia list:
    Joschka Fischer (foreign minister)
    Angela Merkel (leader of the christian democratic party)

    Please get your facts straight!

    You seem to imply the Germans wouldn't want to pay their last respects to JP II, which is quite an offense to me as a german.

    Apart from that i really liked your article.

    Greetings from Germany!
    diebeleidigteleberwurst :)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 06:00:00 am GMT-4  

  • Oh dear! I scanned, and scanned Wikipedia for the German delegatees to the Funeral, and didn't see Germany. I even checked if they were under "Deutschland" on the off chance it was in the original language.

    Alas, my mind didn't pick up the "Allemagne" in French on Wikipedia, so I have immediately corrected the entry.

    And BTW, as I mention above in my comments, I am half-German (my mother is from Hannover). If you were offended thinking that I had purposely slammed Germany, it was as nothing compared to my -- thankfully eroneous assumption -- disgust that Germany hadn't sent representatives to the ceremony.

    Thank God that's cleared up and thanks again for catching that!


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Thu Apr 28, 06:17:00 am GMT-4  

  • You're welcome and you're right:

    It would really have been disgusting if Germany had not sent a delegation to the funeral. It would have been an offense to the polish people, the vatican and the church.

    That's why I felt it needed to be corrected ASAP.

    Thx for that.

    Viele Grüße!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 06:59:00 am GMT-4  

  • "official" list found here:


    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 07:14:00 am GMT-4  

  • Great post. I have to say that I also have felt what you mention about Georg Ratzinger but didn't want to mention it because it was formed purely from a few newspaper interviews ... I guess we'll see if the "feeling" continues but it really doesn't matter.

    By Blogger Julie D., at Thu Apr 28, 08:22:00 am GMT-4  

  • I have two or three or so simple comments.
    1. You are a fantastic blogger!
    2. You say you are not religious, but I think God may be using you mightily
    3. This particular post is full of incredible insight and vision I can't even imagine how much time you put into it.
    4. I have blogrolled you and will be reading you often!

    Keep up the great work

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 10:03:00 am GMT-4  

  • I really enjoyed your impressions and the format you used to share them! To penetrate such mighty an occasion puts the mantle of insight upon the writer’s shoulders. Who after all “understands” the profundity of any individual destiny not even to mention the complexity that is inherent in the added relationship to an institution as fraught with difficulty as the Catholic Church”? You certainly “cut the mustard” in my mind.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 10:46:00 am GMT-4  

  • Thanks so much for your wonderful post. Your feeling that the past month has forced many to look at the Catholic Church in a new way is spot on.

    Myself, I've been in love with our new pope from his first timid smiles and hand gestures on the loggia. But what is it about him?

    After reading hundreds of recaps in the past ten days, I've finally found it. It's that long ago, Pope Benedict gave himself up for Christ in a RADICAL way. A total "self gift." All his eloquent language is God speaking through the mouth of His humble worker.

    If we're despondent about dilatpitated churches and mealy-mouthed preachers, the first question we need to ask is "have we radically given ourselves up for Him?" Pope Benedict's witness has shaprened the focus of many a heart, especially mind.

    Best wishes, keep up the great posts!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Thu Apr 28, 12:22:00 pm GMT-4  

  • Victoria, Thanks for pointing me towards your blog. I reccomended this post to my readers in this post at OC Chronicle.

    I also have some opinions on your post, but I haven't formed them yet. I'll do that later!

    (I hope you take the comment on your picture in the humorous vain it was intended)

    By Blogger Larry OC, at Thu Apr 28, 05:46:00 pm GMT-4  

  • Wonderfully beautiful Vicky. The way in which you gently layer the post to pay tribute to the homily of Pope Benedict XVI was genius. St. Francis De Sales must have been looking over you last night.;)

    The post has captivated me to go back and read the homily in a more alert state to catch some of the subtleties that you have explored here.

    Thank you for your inspiring words. Well done!

    By Blogger Renato, at Thu Apr 28, 10:06:00 pm GMT-4  

  • A general but deeply-felt acknowledgement of thanks to you all who have read and left such kind comments about my piece.

    I'm sure you all understood that I spoke from my heart when I wrote this blogpiece.

    (It took me, as I was commenting to a friend earlier, from 10-12 PM midnight, then I paused for an hour, before continuing to 3-4ish AM -- the last hour, just trying to find the right pics, and getting the "presentation" look right...like the new Pope, I prefer clear, simple visual lines; perhaps my German heritage shining through).

    You know, I have heard it said that "writing is a ghostly process", and never was that truer for me, as I wrote this piece.

    The words poured, and I wrote as if dictated to.


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Fri Apr 29, 01:00:00 am GMT-4  

  • Anonymous, thanks again for that link. If you should happen to find the Official Delegatees List for the INSTALLATION too (not as yet, that I could find, on the Vatican site), I would be grateful!


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Fri Apr 29, 01:01:00 am GMT-4  

  • Julie, it may well be a "female instinct" curiosity, since my mother was the first to point the sourness of Georg Ratzinger vis-a-vis his brother.

    At first, we thought he was resentful that his brother had been given such an onerous task, and his days might be shortened because of that great burden.

    Indeed, he said as much in the first interviews, if you recall.

    But the interviews came coming, and...well as you said, it left that impression.

    No big shakes though. In history we find that there are many rivalries between many younger-older brothers, with the younger brothers often outstripping the older ones. :)


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Fri Apr 29, 01:05:00 am GMT-4  

  • Wayne,

    I can't thank you enough for your comments. How generous a person you are.

    And to give you an idea, when my mother sat down to read this blogpiece, she chastised me,

    "Why do you say you are not religious? You are."

    "Mum, I don't go to Church on Sunday, like you do"

    "Pah. There are many ways of being a good Catholic."

    Not sure if Papa Ratzi would approve of my mother's flirtation with relativism, but I'm glad she contradicts my opinion of myself. ;)


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Fri Apr 29, 01:08:00 am GMT-4  

  • Alan,

    Thank you for your own insight into my insight. ;)

    I have to tell you, my blog is a bit of a cheat, as though I am a future physician (albeit put on hold for the moment), I have a BA in history, and have been patiently schooled into seeing the wide sweep, as well as the detail of life.

    So I can't take credit for that, but my old profs certainly can. :)


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Fri Apr 29, 01:11:00 am GMT-4  

  • J Wild,

    You have hit the nail on the knuckle.

    This past week, and since his Ascension, the Pope has made innumerable references to the "guillotine", as he refers to the Papacy, which he prayed wouldn't fall on him.

    But like you, I believe he accepted it for many reasons, but primarily for two:

    This man has devoted his whole life to his Church. JP II personally asked him at least once to stay on, long after (like Cardinal Martini) Cardinal Ratzinger had wanted to step down and retire from his post.

    How could you now, after witnessing the painful last years and especially excrutiating last months of the late Holy Father's life, just walk away from your mission?

    If you believe in God, and you believe He has a purpose for you, you can't ever walk away.


    I am just reminded of something in my own life...oh well. We shall see. :)

    Thanks for your comments!


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Fri Apr 29, 01:16:00 am GMT-4  

  • Thank you, Larry!

    And nah, how can I be upset at you mistaking me for a hot streetwalker like St. Mary Magdalen. ;)

    In this same vein, I offer this link, from eBay.

    A German chap is selling a car bought from Joseph Kardinal Ratzinger! He has the papers and everything.

    For those interested, the colour of the car isn't purple, red, gold, or indeed, white. But Grey. :)

    Cool! If I only had 50,000 Euro...


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Fri Apr 29, 01:20:00 am GMT-4  

  • Renato, as ever, you know just how to phrase things to make me smile.

    Thank you for your kind words, and the fantastic compliment of telling me that I inspired you to do anything...

    As for St. Francis de Sales, the patron saint of writers...I think it's time for Papa Benny to designate the Patron Saint of Bloggers. Thomas Aquinas is of television, and cinema in general.

    We may have to wait for the (sooner-than-later) canonisation of John Paul The Great, for that. :)


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Fri Apr 29, 01:24:00 am GMT-4  

  • Here you are:

    Mass for the Inauguration of the Pontificate of Benedict XVI

    vatican list of official delegations:


    vatican list of religious
    delegations (italian only):



    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Fri Apr 29, 03:52:00 am GMT-4  

  • Great post, Vic.

    By Blogger JSU, at Fri Apr 29, 07:02:00 am GMT-4  

  • Victoria,
    The interesting thing is, I am not a Catholic... but I am not a Catholic basher either. I am a follower of Jesus Christ and I seek truth and beauty wherever I can find it, and there is indeed truth and beauty within the Catholic Church.

    I Look forward to reading much more of your stuff.

    Wayne M

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Fri Apr 29, 08:09:00 am GMT-4  

  • Victoria,
    i read the Holy Father's speech on the Pope Blog and was struck by the beauty of his words: seemingly the same passages you picked up on. It would be wonderful if more people could read this man's writings:they really seem to me to be inspired by God. I think I'm right in saying that in Hebrew the word for spirit is the same as the word for breath (ruah?). So for Jewish people the Holy Spirit is literally the breath of God. I love this connection and feel it is especially appropriate in the case of our new Papa Ratzi.

    By Blogger kee, at Fri Apr 29, 04:38:00 pm GMT-4  

  • PS I also meant to say I thought your writing was wonderful.
    Well done. A beautiful piece. God Bless you.

    By Blogger kee, at Fri Apr 29, 04:40:00 pm GMT-4  

  • I'm glad you enjoyed it, JSU. And hearing you say that is important to me -- so thanks. :)


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Wed May 04, 09:01:00 am GMT-4  

  • Kee, I thank you so much for your kind words about my post. I'm only too glad to have written it so others could enjoy it.

    As for ruah, I didn't know that, so mondo coolissimo. ;)


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Wed May 04, 09:03:00 am GMT-4  

  • In honor of there being 33 comments...

    Benedict XVI ==> B16
    B16 ==> 216 (B is 2nd letter)
    216 ==> 6 x 6 x 6

    Benedict XVI = 666

    (and I didn't have to stretch anything)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at Mon May 16, 08:05:00 pm GMT-4  

  • Since I haven't been able to crack the registration niceties of WordPress to reply to the Anchoress' link to this post, now over 3 months ago, allow me to say a few words here.

    Firstly, thank you so much Anchoress for writing up this blogpiece in your site today.

    When I first started reading you, thanks to my blog-godfather, JSU, I felt as though I had found someone who felt as I did about my faith.

    It is sometimes very lonely, when you're a tad conservative, a mite religious, young, and in academia (I study not in the UK, BTW, but in the US -- although, yes I am English), to find an outlet to express your opinions.

    If others can, and so volubly, why shouldn't you be able to, yes?

    But in Universities, for a mindset like mine, your voice is drowned out (despite my voice and personality being quite vigourous), your views mocked, and your philosophy looked on in askance.

    This is why blogging about the late Pope and his very capable successor, has been such a release, and I daresay, a blessing.

    Secondly, a quick reply to Hope, a poster who mentioned Melanie Phillips' disconcertion about Pope Benedict XVI's lapse in mentioning Israeli terror victims:

    The new Pope met with the Head Rabbi of Rome within a DAY of his installation as Pope. (The Old Head Rabbi was, of course, prominently mentioned in John Paul's II Will, one of only two people mentioned -- the other being his lifelong friend, Bishop Stanislaw Zil'wa).

    Not only that, but he was his special invited guest in the post-installation dinner the Pope had.

    Sometimes I think no matter how Conservative an observer of the scene, as the excellent Melanie Phillips undoubtedly is, that the creeping Political Correctness our society lives under, must be catered to at all costs.

    Perhaps with Miss Phillips, it was a genuine startled reaction this omission caused, but I also think it is a bit much to start conjecturing possible anti-Semitism (or anti-Judaism, which is quite different), to this new Pope.

    As the Anchoress herself replied in that thread, there is NOTHING in Pope Benedict XVI's life and writings (which are extensive) to suggest he's anti-Judaism, and thereto, anti-Israel.

    In fact, he may be one of the most pro-Jewish people in Germany...a country (my mother's country, by the way) sometimes rent through by a vociferous pro-Palestinianism, which badly masquerades itself as pro-Palestine independence, but often has me wondering at the level of vitriol aimed towards JEWS in general.

    In this question, I am reminded of having seen an episode, shortly after his ascension to the Papacy, on Larry King Live.

    As usual, ole Larry was out of his depths, but one thing he did want to ask of his panel, which included Deepak Chopra.

    "Would a guy like Benedict think a guy like me, a Jew, was damned to Hell...because I'm a Jew?"

    And his guests, especially Deepak, replied yes.

    This is it in a nutshell.

    Certain people, especially secularists who could care less about organised, tradition religion, but most especially Christianity, are deeply afraid that some Catholic Pope looks at them as damned, just because they are who they are.

    This need for Establishment validation of self, is one of the things I most detest about the Me-Generation.

    It colours their entire perceptions of life, and makes their world view paper-thin gossamer in quality.

    Or as then the Cardinal Ratzinger called it, "the dictatorship of relativism".

    In that sense, if they are looking for him, the head of the Catholic Church, to say it's okay for you to be Jewish, or an atheist, or Methodist, as well as being Catholic, then they will be disappointed in Benedict XVI.

    But for me...

    ...the last person I would expect to think Catholicism is just ANOTHER religion is the Pope himself.

    I'll keep checking this old archive thread later, since I notice quite a few people have come via the Anchoress to read it.

    Thanks again!


    By Blogger vbspurs, at Tue Aug 02, 04:24:00 pm GMT-4  

  • Toward the end of your post as you spoke of "putting away childish things" I was reminded of C. S. Lewis' twist on that quote "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."

    By Blogger minimus, at Tue Feb 14, 09:27:00 pm GMT-5  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Advertise on blogs
British Expat Blog Directory.