.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sundries
...a sweatshop of moxie

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Two Sets Of Power Couples

You know, I think "ours" look best, and it ain't close.

President Nicolas Sarkozy of France; Mme. Carla Bruni-Sarkozy; The Prince of Wales; The Duchess of Cornwall.



President George W. Bush; Mrs. Laura Bush; President-Elect Barack Obama; Mrs. Michelle Obama.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, August 11, 2008

Just How Loud Did You Shout

When the US men won the 4x100m relay swimming race? My condo has very thick walls, but I could hear whoops from all my neighbours for over 1 minute after. *

And I kept screaming my fool head off as I watched Michael Phelps celebrate Jason Lezak's stunning victory over the arrogant France team, with every fibre of his body.



Have you also noted that wherever this guy has gone to meet US Olympic athletes, he's brought them luck? Maybe he should be like President Chirac, and be made the unofficial mascot.



*Please note that my condo's President is French, and the building is FULL of his countrymen. Seriously, on my floor alone, we have 3 French couples including a very nasty one which left a taunting note pinned on our door, after England crashed out of World Cup 2006.

Don't worry. I won't return the favour tonight. I may be as arrogant as they are, but I for one, am bien elevée.

UPDATE: The surprising medal count so far, as of time of posting.

NATION TOTAL MEDALS GOLD SILVER BRONZE

United States 11 Medals 3 4 4
China 9 Medals 6 3 0
South Korea 5 Medals 3 2 0
Australia 5 Medals 2 0 3
France 5 Medals 0 3 2
Japan 4 Medals 2 0 2
Italy 4 Medals 1 2 1
Russia 4 Medals 0 3 1
Great Britain 3 Medals 2 0 1
North Korea 3 Medals 0 1 2

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Celle Qui A Dit Non

I bet you didn't know one of my favourite kinds of music is...French rap.

French language and culture holds a loving place in my heart, which I attribute to my German background. If there is one thing a German feels attracted to, it is France -- not the least of which because of the breadth of their competing intellect.

Unlike the French, though, Germans are only just now feeling at home with patriotism. In France, it is quite different.

France is an ideal that even the most Leftist of French can adore without shame, without feeling as if they have committed a bourgeois bêtise. "Vive la France!" is an emotional outpouring of support, but also of ideological purity, after all.

This is droned into all schoolchildren, who then enter the prestigious schools and universities which form their elite bureaucracy. The hand-wringing which American patriotism evokes in their bureaucratic counterparts, is practically non-existent in France.

In a few days, during quatorze juillet, France will be celebrating her 219 years of independence. Yes, they are on their Fifth Republic, with many monarchical fits and starts in between.

But the idea of France, that glorious place where reason and logic, elegance and good taste, intelligence and dignity reigns supreme, is immutable.

Or is it?

The problem which plagues the Old World is their immigration issue, most particularly where the immigrant is of a different race. Integration is not coming easily to Europe, but not at all.

To hear them speak of America, as television channel France2 did with the Clinton-Obama campaign, as they gleefully reported the rejection of Obama by voters "because he was black" (and giving no other reason), you would think such a scolding attitude belies a nation which has no such problems.

Why, if a French black man were to run for President of France, he would win in a landslide! Right?

Actually, a black presidential French candidate is so unthinkable today, as to be almost laughable. His chances for Elysée consideration stand at exactly nil.

There is but one black representative in 555 sitting in the French National Assembly. There are 11 minorities in total. There is no black Senator. There are no black mayors in France amongst 36,000. There are no black French CEOs. The very first black newsreader was elevated to his position two whole years ago.

In short, the French power structure is lily-white.

Much much more than America's is, or ever was.

Yes, the French love France. But I wonder how much they would love it, if France encountered the same negativity towards their love of country, as Americans do from certain quarters.

This is where French rap comes in, at last. You must've been wondering.

Because just on the eve of these 219 years of "Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité", comes word that a French rapper may just be going to prison.

No, not because of his off-music shenanigans. There's no drive-by shooting, gangland club or East Coast-West Coast rivalry involved.

His freedom is at stake because he wrote this in a rap song:

"France is a bitch, don’t forget to f*ck her 'til she’s exhausted/You have to treat her like a slut, man."

And just in case you didn't get his intent, he included this rhetorical flourish:

"Moi, je pisse sur Napoléon et le général de Gaulle."

Watch it here. (Due to female nudity, NSFW)



This song is what the French government says has incited riots, and therefore to the pokey Monsieur R (Richard Makelela, as he is in real-life) might go.

"If convicted, the rapper faces up to three years in prison and a fine of €75,000 (£51,000)."

This story isn't new. The rap song isn't new. I've heard it for some time. But the climate in France changed dramatically after the riots in Paris 2 years ago, and now the elevation of the chap who called the rioters "racaille" to the Presidency of France.

Of course, not all countries would consider such a complaint to be valid.

As another blogger remembers, West Indian-born British dub artist, Linton Kwesi Johnson, once wrote this about his new homeland:

Inglan is a bitch
Dere’s no escapin it
Inglan is a bitch
Y´u haffi know how fi survive in it

(Incidentally, I'm not sure if this constant misogynist language and intent is a frustrated male thing, or a frustrated black culture thing or what, but I find it despicable. It makes supporting their position nearly impossible)

Needless-to-say, Mr. Johnson was not imprisoned for his anti-patriotic lyrics.

He may have incited riots, as certainly his tenure with the British Black Panthers could not have gone unnoticed, but we in Britain have a tradition of free speech. The French only think they have.

In a startling piece yesterday on the nature of Patriotism, Eric S. Raymond reminded us:

"Embedded deep in the American model of patriotism is the notion that it may be expressed by a passionate determination to reform or even completely upend American institutions in service to the ideals behind them. This is not, as far as I can tell, true anywhere else in the world. It would seem an alien idea even in modern France, where the excesses of the Jacobins irreversibly tainted that sort of fervor with blood."

That's it, exactly.

Their revolution is rooted, steeped and nurtured in blood. Violence is its afterbirth.

Freedom of speech is not a thing won, or maintained like the American or British examples. It was killed for.

This is why an attack on France, its history and its leaders, however lame and lacking maturity, is not something which can be ignored.

And the native French, particularly its elite, are determined not to be caught unaware by a revolution they didn't start.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

If The World Could Vote For US President

Religious people are often chided for believing in "fairy tales". No such derision is attached to die-hard Obama supporters who believe everything will begin to right itself in America, once the Illinois Senator is elected as US President.



After designating him "Le Candidat Global" in an earlier issue, this weekend Le Monde published the deafening stats of Europeans who favour him over his rival.

82% of Germans. 84% of the French. 74% of the British. 72% of Spaniards.

These are not quite W. Virginia (or African-American) percentages, but nevertheless, they're pretty conclusive:

The world wants Barack Obama as US President.

Why is there such an obvious disparity in viewpoints, between what foreigners want, and what the polling numbers show Americans want (i.e., that Obama has had a very mild upsurge in support, after Senator Clinton "suspended" her campaign)?

What is it that they are seeing, or they believe they see in him, that the US public doesn't to that extent? Is it race? Is it ideology? Or is it something else --something metaphysical?

Let's examine the first attempt at an answer.

In 2005, when Pope John Paul II died, people all over the world decided they wanted a non-white Cardinal to be elected Pope.

Do you recall that? Everyone was hedging bets it would be Cardinal Maradiaga of Honduras, or even better, Cardinal Francis Arinze of Nigeria.

The ironic part of this (apart from the fact that those people included a lot of non-Catholics or non-practising Catholics, and therefore had no stake in the outcome) is that they were overwhelmingly of liberal world view...and yet they were choosing Cardinal Arinze as their go-to-guy simply because he was an "other". He was black.



Never mind that he was almost as conservative (some say more conservative) as the hated front-runner, "God's Rottweiler"/"The Panzer Cardinal", Joseph Ratzinger.

What mattered is that Francis Arinze was not white. To paraphrase the Clintonian slogan, it was...the statement, stupid.

So race is no doubt a reason why the world wants to have Obama be "their" President. He's the "other" in this election too.

But what of ideology? Is the world more comfortable with a Democrat than a Republican in the White House, even a "maverick" RINO like Senator John McCain?

During the past few years, Europeans have ousted leaders who were anti-American, and put pro-Americans in their place.

The Big Euro Three still includes Labour ally British PM Gordon Brown, but it now welcomes Nicolas Sarkozy of France, and before him, Dr. Angela Merkel of Germany. Even if Gordon Brown is defeated by David Cameron, surely a Tory premier wouldn't hit a sour note on this chorus of approval.

Americans reading this blogpost, then, might be forgiven if they think the most important European players are now Right-Wing, and therefore, so must the public who elected them be.

They're not.

The overwhelming world view of continental Europeans is still endemically pro-Leftist. No matter who is in power, the EU countries will always favour more socialist policies than the US will, not only because of their post-feudal traditions -- but also because they believe that is the fairest system around.

Americans do not.

That is, some do, a lot do in fact, but most don't.

They believe nationalised health care, and government handouts weaken any economy, and makes the State act as parent-surrogate. Neither sentiment jibes with American notions of individuality, and deep-rooted antagonism to federalism.

So whilst the Old World may be turning to the Right, Europeans are firmly committed to the Left's view of the world. And what are the 3 most important factors in Leftist ideology?

Peace
Tolerance
Equality


(The Right's being Freedom, Security, and Values, of course)

It's not difficult to see which candidate of the two running for President, most aligns himself with the first ideology.

What, though, if it's deeper than ideology? What if it's to do with perceptions of how a President Obama would handle the world's only remaining super-power, at its very height of power? In other words, what if it's metaphysical, rather than the grubbier reasons of race and ideology?

To answer that, one must pose the question: what does the world want from an US President? Let's provide some random answers.

- An immediate pull-out from Iraq
- Nationalised health care
- To repeal the death sentence
- To ban firearms
- To allow same-sex marriages
- To raise taxes for government programmes
- Get a clue about geography and world culture
- To adopt the Metric System
- To make Americans less fat



Despite the obvious tongue-in-cheek, these are not answers so much as metaphysical demands.

The world demands that Americans be less aggressive; be more concerned with the rest of the world; in short, rethink, reshape and reform themselves, both systemically, but also personally.

My God, it's a total INJUSTICE that the world can't vote for the US President.

For ill - or for good - it's out of our hands: both are Americans and nothing can be done about it. We start from the fact that if you're not American, you don't have the right to vote and to choose between the two in November. This is a great injustice because the 44th president of the United States will decide things that could affect foreigners more than his own compatriots.

Quel dommage!

America would be so different if only the world could vote.

Well, the next closest thing to being able to vote, is at least to choose a candidate which is most likely to change America into one's ideal America.

That's what foreigners see in Senator Obama. The signals he sends are just as blaring as his international poll numbers. And if they don't hear it from his own lips, they are culling information from those who might serve in an Obama administration.

On Tuesday, Richard Danzig (the most likely choice for National Security Adviser according to observers) made it perfectly plain that President Obama's geopolitics will be nothing short of bearable.

Literally.

Mr Danzig told the Centre for New American Security: “Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.” [...]

Mr Danzig spelt out the need to change by reading a paragraph from chapter one of the children’s classic, which says: “Here is Edward Bear, coming downstairs now, bump, bump, bump on the back of his head behind Christopher Robin. It is, as far as he knows, the only way of coming down stairs. But sometimes he thinks there really is another way if only he could stop bumping a minute and think about it.”

Mr. Danzig also referenced Luke Skywalker, but I confess, even I have my limits about quoting this geopolitical theatre of the absurd.

General De Gaulle once dismissed Brazil with these few words: "Brazil is not a serious country".

And I'm here to tell you that Senator Barack Obama is not a serious candidate. Not for the US Presidency, he's not. It doesn't matter if the world wants him, academia want him, media want him, even his Kenyan grannie wants him.

Americans don't elect Presidential candidates whose associations are anti-American, and whose pronouncements are not tough, and realistic. They just don't. On the rare occasions when they have, their administrations ended as utter failures and that's why there have only been 3 Democrats elected to second terms in all of the 20th century. Only FDR's can have been considered a success -- and he waged war, okaying the nuclear bomb, ushering in the American Century.

However, if they do this November, and this Winnie the Pooh fairy tale strategy is put into place, America will be weakened structurally beyond belief.

Ahhh.

Maybe now we have the real reason why the world wants Obama. They want a weaker America; which ever candidate comes closest to delivering that wish, they will be in his or her favour.

Well, apparently Obama can deliver that wish, down to the pots of hunny, hugs, and multi-coloured rainbows.



...sorry World. America is a serious country. Now close your eyes and if you're good children, we'll read you another fairy tale in 4 years. Promise.

UPDATED: There's even a website: If the World Could Vote. So far:



Hey, World. How'd the last vote turn out for ya?



IN THE COMMENTS: Ruth Anne Adams writes she actually took Holy Communion from Cardinal Arinze's hands! Moreover, in 2005, you can see she was hugely in the Arinze-for-Pope camp, in this well-written blogpost.

Ron reminds Sundries' readers that maybe Thailand's unusual pro-McCain support (97.3%) might have something to do with his Southeast Asian experiences...

Alcibiades goes one further and says that Thailand is a major US trading partner, and McCain represents pro-free market trade than Obama does.

JSU definitively says: "I bet Iraq would pick McCain in a landslide, though." Heh. True. But think about why that is true.

Madcynic interjects with the lone European voice in the comments: "The current administration did a very good job of making an enemy out of large parts of the European populace though. Noone wants that to continue and people believe Obama to be the better choice to prevent further enmities and misunderstandings...". Though his viewpoint, I think most of us can agree that's true.

And thanks to AmeriDan, as ever!

Related

Senator Obama May Not Win, But Colonel Obama Would
It's the Arugula, Stupid
The World Wants Obama Coalition

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Sarkozy Fan Tutte

Very rarely do left-wing politicians get the same amount ferocity of opinions, as do right-wing politicians.

Whilst General Pinochet was reviled as a tinpot hatchet man, and gruesomely villainous dictator, a certain lawyer by the name of Fidel Castro gets a pass from those who hate Pinochet for the same, if not worse atrocities.

Not having lived during the Nixon era, I can't say if Bush Derangement Syndrome trumps the vitriol lobbed at that man's head.

I have seen it manifest itself in France, though, even from a distance.

Now it's official. A French psychiatrist has coined a phrase for their equivalent of BDS:

Obsessive Sarkosis

("Doctor! Doctor! Is it fatal? No, Madame, you will be cured in 5 years, unless Ségo is still around.")

Dr. Serge Hefez assures us that in his surgery, a lot of his patients suddenly start referring to President Nicolas Sarkozy by name.

“He’s penetrated some of their deepest fantasies. I noticed all this passion in people speaking of him, and I thought there is something particular about this man — he’s like a reflection of us in the mirror.”

The French have even poked fun at themselves about this new phenomenon in cartoons. One had this patient saying to her shrink:

“I’m very worried.

Sunday, at the Louvre, I asked a guard where to find the room of Egyptian Sarkozycophagi. At dinner with a musicologist, I said twice that my favorite opera is ‘Sarkozy Fan Tutte.’ I’d like to know if this is serious and how to cure it.”

Only the French could joke about an obsession and reference an opera. The article continues:

Television covers Mr. Sarkozy’s every gesture, in both homage and mockery, itself an effort to create distance from the phenomenon that it perpetuates and magnifies. It is all part of what the French have come to call the “pipolisation” of political life, a term, presumably derived from People magazine, that refers to the idolatry of celebrities and soap opera. Dr. Hefez considers the trend an example of “democracy turning against itself, as Tocqueville foresaw.”

The shock of finding out the French might bury their noses into People Magazine (!) almost made me faint. Who reads that in the States in such quantities, that it should be exported to La Belle Snobe??

I must be out of circulation.

(A little publishing humour for you)

Really, I can't say that I blame the French. I'm not a big fan of Sarkozy. I know he may be pro-USA, or as much as an inhabitant of the Elysée can be, but I still see him for what he is.

President Bling-Bling, a slightly oily demagogue who never met a Mont Blanc pen he didn't like.



Related

If Sarkozy is a Mirror, What is Rudd?
Bona Fide Love Story
French Projection

Labels: , ,

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Reims

Have you ever gotten a shock of surprise, when reading a particular passage in a book?

It so happens that the current book I am reading, the late Sir Steven Runciman's The Traveller's Alphabet (sadly out of print), was not the book which gave me this start of recognition.

But when he got to the bit about his trip to Roumania, I suddenly remembered this remarkable lady's book of later memoirs, and that very reaction which they produced about a location, at one point, which I had been meaning to tell you about for a long time.

First, let me transcribe the exact passage so you can get into the right mood.

During the famous Versailles Conference, where she played such a dazzling role for her adopted homeland, she was lionised socially, and literally invited everywhere.

One day, in the middle of the treaty-making, she just decided to play tourist, and did what many of us would do -- went to visit one of those enormously grand cathedrals, of which France has an embarrassment of riches.

Namely, Notre-Dame de Reims.

"A moving sight, indeed, that mighty cathedral rising like a ghost of unimaginable beauty from a grey mass of formless ruins.

Because of its many wounds, its lines and angels had become blurred, softened as seen through a veil; its glassless windows paint a tracery of lace against the sky, and, like so many decapitated martyrs, its statues seem frozen with pain.

Yet there the great building stands invincible, having defied the modern means of destruction and with them the spirit of hate. A vision of another age, of a stronger faith, ascending above the surrounding chaos, more sacred than ever because of its mutiliation, more supremely stately because all around it has been laid low, and today the sky is its only vault.

Such it appeared to me that early spring day, when we stood, mute, gazing up at its perfect majesty. Somehow one became speechless or spoke only in whispers."

Ladies and gentlemen, in my short lifetime, I have read hundreds, thousands of books, but never have I read a paragraph which so impressed me for its perfect descriptive powers.

This lady, vainglorious, slightly absurd, and magnificent, had the power to see something as it was, and yet to describe it flawlessly so that at the end, you felt as if you yourself had drunk of that imperial cup in Moscow, had viewed that ravine in Malta, and had quadrilled with Winston Churchill until your clingy dress brought down two partners on the dancefloor with you, by mere conjuring of her pen.

In short, that woman was one hell of a writer.

--

We arrived in Luxembourg's tiny airport, my father, mother and I, via the Bahamas on Icelandic Airways that December morning, ready to make a run to the car rental counter, but first had to pass through the custom's window.

Despite the three of us being "European", it was my newly American citizen mother's passport that the lady behind the guiché fawned over, practically falling over herself to welcome an US citizen to her little land -- an attitude which has forever stayed with me, because it was repeated a dozen times that following month on the continent.

When my dad and I presented our passports next (I was a dependent in his passport, as was the custom in those days), she took a look at that blue UK booklet of travel, and wordlessly, stamped it and bade us no farewell.

Arriving at the car rental office...no counter as thought, but actually a little wooden office located outside the airport...the lady there took one look at us three, and starting speaking in rapid-fire Letzebuergisch, though none of us were Luxembourgers.

Not sure what this baptism of linguistic fire was about, but her surly demeanour was not improved even when we tried German and French, as a courtesy, before my dad opened his mouth and finally said, "Do you speak English?".

The paperwork was still to be done, despite long-standing reservations Telexed from the States (remember Telexes?).

There were International Driver's Licences to produce, on old-fashioned paper with stamps and black-and-white photos, long since gone today.

And again, those passports, since you can't do anything in Europe without documentation up the wazoo, something Americans and British both should be happy their cultures are by nature, against.

Finally, we had our keys to the Opel Kadett in dad's hands, since of course, he drives.

He may have paid for my mother's medical education because as he said, "I don't want to live the next 50 years beside a stupid woman", he may have encouraged me to stay away from the kitchen, and paid for riding lessons when other girls were learning how to do laundry and sweeping up, but he was still macho enough to always insist on being the driver in any car he was in.

He drove.

It was December, and of course, there was snow all over the ground.

Being British, he is a trusting sort, who still never checks what a person behind a counter gives him, because he always assumes the bag will contain exactly what he paid for (to his chagrin, when he arrives with two Big Macs, instead of the Fish sandwich I requested).

He turned on the windshield wipers on the Kadett, and...nothing. He got out of the car, jiggled them, and...nothing.

We were on our way to Paris, with no windshield wipers working, and with snow threatening to bear down on our party of 3.

He turned on the headlights...nothing. This can't be happening!

(My mother immediately blamed the surly Luxembourger woman who obviously "had it in for us", which is a common assumption between most women about each other, by the way)

With no windshield wipers, and no headlights, and a starving child, we rushed from Luxembourg to Metz, then on our way to Nancy when it started to snow.

With mittened hand, my intrepid father cleared the snow from the windshield, as he tried to speed ever faster in the direction of Paris, convinced he could make it before it got really dark.

(Fortunately that American nightmare of coppers pollulating the highways just when you least need them, doesn't really apply on the continent. We were safe from tickets defended in awkward French, as long as we stayed on the highway)

Daylight now was a mass of dark greys, and menacing inky blues.

Whether by design or complete and utter misdirection, we turned into the nearest big town, since we obviously were not going to get to Paris by nightfall.

We three of us, cold, hungry, and lost, were in Reims.

With a child's concept of time and space, the ride might have taken 8 hours or 80 minutes, for all I knew.

And looking at a map today, I have no idea how dad took that exit that led us to Reims, since clearly Nancy is well below it.

Mother was asleep in the front seat, but I was very awake now, having decided that if she were sleeping, I would be on duty as co-pilot for my father, still doing the mitten jig every minute.

The thing with family car trips is that they are not tour guide jaunts, who get announcements in 5 languages like, "Turning your heads, you will now see Reims approaching to your left", whereupon docile tourists in coaches do as they are bid, and suitably enlightened, they open their green Michelin guides to the Reims section.

No.

Dad and I simply, and with expert economy of speech, looked at the passing signs and wondered where we were.

Théâtre this, Republique that, and Musée the other.

A million towns in France are exactly the same, but undaunted, dad kept driving, no doubt on the lookout for a nice, but not too costly hotel to kip down his tribe.

That's when it happened.

Imagine me, a child in warm earmuffs, and a little cute beige Christian Dior coat, leaning over my father's shoulders as he drives, suddenly turning in slow motion (why are unforgettable memories always in slow motion, as if in a dream?) and seeing a long foggy avenue to my right.

In that exact moment, in fact, as dreams tend to be, with perfect timing, the fog lifts slightly and to my right is an enormous edifice, in more shades of grey that I have ever seen in my whole life then, and even now.

Reims Cathedral loomed to the right of our car and thus stunned my father and I into submission, as it had for over 1600 years to families the world over, come to pay their respects.

I prod mother awake.

Years later, she said the sight that she beheld as she opened her eyes was like in a gothic nightmare, all jutting spires, and overly imposing saints staring at her, no, through her very being.





Wow, I am so happy my memory is one of shared awe, not fleeting, devilish terror as hers.

And now I must confess that I love Reims. And I'm very scared of it at the same time.

What was it that Queen Marie said?

"...that mighty cathedral rising like a ghost of unimaginable beauty from a grey mass of formless ruins".

I was seeing it a good 70 years after she had, and yet that description SIMPLY cannot be improved upon.

With fog spiralling around us in the massive square in front of the cathedral, my father held my little gloved hands, approaching to pause to look at the august doors, and their weirdly carvings.

I was a stoic little kid, and would never confess to fright or discomfort, but he must've sensed me quaver through our joined hands as I looked up and up and up to the reliefs of saints in Christian agony.

He hurried me along, and there before us, stood the most enormous cavity of a nave you have ever seen in your life.

When, years later, I read that armies had lodged themselves in that self-same cathedral, including possibly (disreputably) a German ancestor of mine, or two, I understood.

Yes, a child has a memory of bigness that is by its very nature, exaggerated. Anyone who has ever tried to visit their grade school as an adult, will know exactly that feeling, "...was my desk really that small?".

But Reims cathedral defies magnitude.

First, though I've since seen photographs of its interior which shocked me for its brightness, the Reims I knew was as dark as sin, and nearly as welcoming.

I cannot remember the layout exactly, but never will I forget the dazzling statue at the centre of Saint Joan, yes, that Saint Joan, who is not buried there having had her ashes thrown into the Seine, but who we British had selfishly put to death.

But Saint Joan HAD been inside Reims, as she witnessed the fruit of her battles in the coronation of that duplicitous king, Charles VII.

In fact, Reims cathedral for centuries fulfilled the same function Westminster Abbey did in England -- not only the last resting place of the august Elizabeth I, and a slew of other kings, but also the place of their crowning before God.

I have been to both, and I have to say, Reims is the place where even a king can feel humbled (or indeed, a queen), not the dear old spinsterish Abbey.

I am not sure if all parents do this, or it was just mine, or even, if it was the knowledge that we were "just" in a church, for all its jumped up grandiosity, but my parents let me wander all alone for a good 15 minutes.

Tombs passed me by, as I inched my way around the littered chairs in the middle of nave -- which then, as now, I found a little awkwardly-placed.





I saw him.

He must've been middle-aged, but to me he was old. A man wearing a black overcoat, holding a candle in his hand, praying with his lips moving, but in French, so that the sound was like a gushing stream in soft flow.

"Je vous salue, Marie, pleine de grâce.
Le Seigneur est avec vous...

(Je vous salue Marie, pleine de grâce...beautiful, just beautiful)

I stood there, transfixed, for seemingly hours.

But even so, I was careful not to be seen by him, conscious that I was intruding into a very private moment, one that fascinated me, because I had never seen my own father in such a position.

Children's ultimate yardstick being all things parental, of course.

And just like that, my parents reappeared. In their eyes I saw my marvel mirrored back at me, so I knew that, veterans of many cathedrals themselves, this was a special one nonetheless.

I turned back, as we left, having yet to learn the lesson of Lot's wife. One last look, one last frisson.

Reims...

Even its very name suffuses me with a chill of majesty that I believe we mortals were bade by God to know as the word "awe".

We went inside our car, and drove now in the darkness, carefully, with hand on the horn.

The streets were empty (and I've been told by many Frenchmen, that Reims at night, is nearly dead), so whatever blessing we had been given inside the cathedral, followed us on our way to our lodging.

Neither my parents nor I recall the name of the ENORMOUS hotel we ultimately found to lay our weary heads, but I do remember one thing about it.

My dad mentioned what a wonderful cathedral her city had, and the concierge lady, who sported a manly blond haircut -- a French Gertrude Stein -- took about 10 minutes to teach him the right pronunciation of said city, with such a gutteral accent, emphasising that nasally sound, that even a German would be proud of.

REIMS!

"Reims"

NON! REIMS!

"Reims?"

REIMS! REIMS!! REIMS!!!

As long as I live, I will never forget Reims' farewell impression on my childish eyes, my tall father towering over this tiny corpulent Frenchwoman, as she schooled him (tired, dishevelled, in need of bed not elocution lessons) as to the correct pronunciation of her town, Reims.

If only Audioblogger were still around. Wouldn't we have fun listening to me saying REIMS! over and over again, just like that lady concierge did over 20 years ago.

And no, I don't ever want to return to Reims again, despite my love for it. Some places do not need a repeat visit. Let them haunt your reveries until all your hairs be white, until you die.

Adieu, Reims.

Labels: , , ,


 




Advertise on blogs
British Expat Blog Directory.