.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sundries
...a sweatshop of moxie

Monday, January 19, 2009

Those Dapper Florentines

Since many commenters liked my Sartorialist blogpost a week ago, I return with three of my favourite snaps in that hallowed blog.

Florence is cold and rainy in January, but that never stopped Florentines from looking FABU anyway. Today, the men get their fair share of attention.

CHAP ON BIKE IN BLUE



I rarely wear jeans, though I have these Diesels that really flatter my complexion, but this man is wearing his with a pitch perfect attention to colour and fabric.

I'm almost sure that gorgeous coat is a Barbour jacket, which I used to favour in the UK.

It's possibly the Eksdale, which costs a pretty penny in any country. But that's precisely why it works. This fashion snap is almost impossible to imagine being pulled off with such élan in any country but Italy.

Incidentally, this post was entitled "Spinning Class". Heh.

OH THAT LEATHER KILLS ME



I have a confession to make. I adore, simply adore Italian leather. For years I have dreamt of having precisely the colour gloves worn by this gentleman, but only for an old-fashioned messenger bag, the kind that was toted around by Dag Hammarskjöld and such.

Incidentally, these gloves work for him overall, but if you want to be picky about it, it's overkill with the boots and the bulky pea-green, Martha Stewart K-Mart line scarf.



The Sartorialist called this series of photos "the finishing touch", since each of them uses a defining article of clothing to complete the look.

Please note that one should never wear red, ever, anywhere, on one's person when already wearing burgundy. It's a big fashion no-no, and I'm glad his commenters picked up on it.

But perhaps it's the stove-pipe pants, which are in fashion at the moment, or the shininess of the shoes (I love a man with unscuffed lace-ups) but these peek-a-boo socks work.

The true sign of a perfectionist is wearing something no one or few will see. This is why Erich von Stroheim spent a fortune on monogrammed, silken underpants for extras playing Austro-Hungarian officers, in one of his films.

Don't do it for anyone but yourself, and you will feel immensely rewarded.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Ingles Sin Barreras

This blogpost is a preview of one I have planned in the near future -- which I will only hint at below.

Sundries regular and friend, Ruth Anne Adams, had mentioned the lisping tendencies of Spaniards. Well, maybe she and others would like to hear Generalissimo Francisco Franco attempting to speak the Queen's English.



Well, I understood Viva España.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Divided Loyalties

For such a mutt as I am, unusual for an European, I usually wince whenever there's a soccer semi-final somewhere in this world. Invariably, two countries or clubs I am closely tied to by blood or emotion are represented.

Oh, who to choose! Cringe, cringe, I go. Not today, boy. It's Germany all the way!

But maybe this Turkish Taxi Driver can relate.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

If The World Could Vote For US President

Religious people are often chided for believing in "fairy tales". No such derision is attached to die-hard Obama supporters who believe everything will begin to right itself in America, once the Illinois Senator is elected as US President.



After designating him "Le Candidat Global" in an earlier issue, this weekend Le Monde published the deafening stats of Europeans who favour him over his rival.

82% of Germans. 84% of the French. 74% of the British. 72% of Spaniards.

These are not quite W. Virginia (or African-American) percentages, but nevertheless, they're pretty conclusive:

The world wants Barack Obama as US President.

Why is there such an obvious disparity in viewpoints, between what foreigners want, and what the polling numbers show Americans want (i.e., that Obama has had a very mild upsurge in support, after Senator Clinton "suspended" her campaign)?

What is it that they are seeing, or they believe they see in him, that the US public doesn't to that extent? Is it race? Is it ideology? Or is it something else --something metaphysical?

Let's examine the first attempt at an answer.

In 2005, when Pope John Paul II died, people all over the world decided they wanted a non-white Cardinal to be elected Pope.

Do you recall that? Everyone was hedging bets it would be Cardinal Maradiaga of Honduras, or even better, Cardinal Francis Arinze of Nigeria.

The ironic part of this (apart from the fact that those people included a lot of non-Catholics or non-practising Catholics, and therefore had no stake in the outcome) is that they were overwhelmingly of liberal world view...and yet they were choosing Cardinal Arinze as their go-to-guy simply because he was an "other". He was black.



Never mind that he was almost as conservative (some say more conservative) as the hated front-runner, "God's Rottweiler"/"The Panzer Cardinal", Joseph Ratzinger.

What mattered is that Francis Arinze was not white. To paraphrase the Clintonian slogan, it was...the statement, stupid.

So race is no doubt a reason why the world wants to have Obama be "their" President. He's the "other" in this election too.

But what of ideology? Is the world more comfortable with a Democrat than a Republican in the White House, even a "maverick" RINO like Senator John McCain?

During the past few years, Europeans have ousted leaders who were anti-American, and put pro-Americans in their place.

The Big Euro Three still includes Labour ally British PM Gordon Brown, but it now welcomes Nicolas Sarkozy of France, and before him, Dr. Angela Merkel of Germany. Even if Gordon Brown is defeated by David Cameron, surely a Tory premier wouldn't hit a sour note on this chorus of approval.

Americans reading this blogpost, then, might be forgiven if they think the most important European players are now Right-Wing, and therefore, so must the public who elected them be.

They're not.

The overwhelming world view of continental Europeans is still endemically pro-Leftist. No matter who is in power, the EU countries will always favour more socialist policies than the US will, not only because of their post-feudal traditions -- but also because they believe that is the fairest system around.

Americans do not.

That is, some do, a lot do in fact, but most don't.

They believe nationalised health care, and government handouts weaken any economy, and makes the State act as parent-surrogate. Neither sentiment jibes with American notions of individuality, and deep-rooted antagonism to federalism.

So whilst the Old World may be turning to the Right, Europeans are firmly committed to the Left's view of the world. And what are the 3 most important factors in Leftist ideology?

Peace
Tolerance
Equality


(The Right's being Freedom, Security, and Values, of course)

It's not difficult to see which candidate of the two running for President, most aligns himself with the first ideology.

What, though, if it's deeper than ideology? What if it's to do with perceptions of how a President Obama would handle the world's only remaining super-power, at its very height of power? In other words, what if it's metaphysical, rather than the grubbier reasons of race and ideology?

To answer that, one must pose the question: what does the world want from an US President? Let's provide some random answers.

- An immediate pull-out from Iraq
- Nationalised health care
- To repeal the death sentence
- To ban firearms
- To allow same-sex marriages
- To raise taxes for government programmes
- Get a clue about geography and world culture
- To adopt the Metric System
- To make Americans less fat



Despite the obvious tongue-in-cheek, these are not answers so much as metaphysical demands.

The world demands that Americans be less aggressive; be more concerned with the rest of the world; in short, rethink, reshape and reform themselves, both systemically, but also personally.

My God, it's a total INJUSTICE that the world can't vote for the US President.

For ill - or for good - it's out of our hands: both are Americans and nothing can be done about it. We start from the fact that if you're not American, you don't have the right to vote and to choose between the two in November. This is a great injustice because the 44th president of the United States will decide things that could affect foreigners more than his own compatriots.

Quel dommage!

America would be so different if only the world could vote.

Well, the next closest thing to being able to vote, is at least to choose a candidate which is most likely to change America into one's ideal America.

That's what foreigners see in Senator Obama. The signals he sends are just as blaring as his international poll numbers. And if they don't hear it from his own lips, they are culling information from those who might serve in an Obama administration.

On Tuesday, Richard Danzig (the most likely choice for National Security Adviser according to observers) made it perfectly plain that President Obama's geopolitics will be nothing short of bearable.

Literally.

Mr Danzig told the Centre for New American Security: “Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.” [...]

Mr Danzig spelt out the need to change by reading a paragraph from chapter one of the children’s classic, which says: “Here is Edward Bear, coming downstairs now, bump, bump, bump on the back of his head behind Christopher Robin. It is, as far as he knows, the only way of coming down stairs. But sometimes he thinks there really is another way if only he could stop bumping a minute and think about it.”

Mr. Danzig also referenced Luke Skywalker, but I confess, even I have my limits about quoting this geopolitical theatre of the absurd.

General De Gaulle once dismissed Brazil with these few words: "Brazil is not a serious country".

And I'm here to tell you that Senator Barack Obama is not a serious candidate. Not for the US Presidency, he's not. It doesn't matter if the world wants him, academia want him, media want him, even his Kenyan grannie wants him.

Americans don't elect Presidential candidates whose associations are anti-American, and whose pronouncements are not tough, and realistic. They just don't. On the rare occasions when they have, their administrations ended as utter failures and that's why there have only been 3 Democrats elected to second terms in all of the 20th century. Only FDR's can have been considered a success -- and he waged war, okaying the nuclear bomb, ushering in the American Century.

However, if they do this November, and this Winnie the Pooh fairy tale strategy is put into place, America will be weakened structurally beyond belief.

Ahhh.

Maybe now we have the real reason why the world wants Obama. They want a weaker America; which ever candidate comes closest to delivering that wish, they will be in his or her favour.

Well, apparently Obama can deliver that wish, down to the pots of hunny, hugs, and multi-coloured rainbows.



...sorry World. America is a serious country. Now close your eyes and if you're good children, we'll read you another fairy tale in 4 years. Promise.

UPDATED: There's even a website: If the World Could Vote. So far:



Hey, World. How'd the last vote turn out for ya?



IN THE COMMENTS: Ruth Anne Adams writes she actually took Holy Communion from Cardinal Arinze's hands! Moreover, in 2005, you can see she was hugely in the Arinze-for-Pope camp, in this well-written blogpost.

Ron reminds Sundries' readers that maybe Thailand's unusual pro-McCain support (97.3%) might have something to do with his Southeast Asian experiences...

Alcibiades goes one further and says that Thailand is a major US trading partner, and McCain represents pro-free market trade than Obama does.

JSU definitively says: "I bet Iraq would pick McCain in a landslide, though." Heh. True. But think about why that is true.

Madcynic interjects with the lone European voice in the comments: "The current administration did a very good job of making an enemy out of large parts of the European populace though. Noone wants that to continue and people believe Obama to be the better choice to prevent further enmities and misunderstandings...". Though his viewpoint, I think most of us can agree that's true.

And thanks to AmeriDan, as ever!

Related

Senator Obama May Not Win, But Colonel Obama Would
It's the Arugula, Stupid
The World Wants Obama Coalition

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, May 02, 2008

I Touch Myself

In fact, we all can now, if this latest gadget takes off.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the crotch-keyboard.




Described as a possible "mysterious Dutch design student", Erik De Nijs the inventor of the crotch-keyboard, is laying low given the utter hyper-geekiness of his invention.

What do you think? Would you buy one for yourself?

I mean, look at the advantages of having a qwerty keyboard near your g-spot.



Only one "joystick" joke per reader, please.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

No Risk No Fun

Germany's "TV Total" show has weekly compilations of funny outtakes. The segment is called "Nippel", but don't worry, unless you speak German this is totally work-place friendly.

Call it a change of pace from the recent, unceasing spate of Reverend Wright spewings, both his and mine.

Let's have a real laugh today, or as close to it as Germans can get.



P-O-RRRRRRR-N-O!

Oh, and "Schwul" means gay. Enjoy!

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Abhoring The Vacuum

Back in the 19th century, there were many New World countries which used to set up clapboard booths in quaint villages, and towns, advertising endless new opportunities and exotic foreign environs for millions of fed up Europeans, most of whom were dying for a fresh start anyway and didn't need much motivation to emigrate.





The country which led the way was that of Emperor Dom Pedro II of Brazil, whose emigration booths, as they were called, happily signed up thousands of Germans, Italians, Balkanites and even Confederate Americans, who promptly took the next ship.

(These latter, called Confederados in Portuguese, mostly settled in the imperial mountain retreat of Petropolis and were instrumental in starting Brazil's cotton industry which Dom Pedro wanted his country to lead the world in)

But what of today?

In the day and age of social democracy, where Europe leads the world in terms of socialised medicine, education, and extensive government programmes for the needy and comfortable alike, would you imagine that there are those in the old continent, who would chuck it all away to become that most desperate of individual: a recently-arrived immigrant to a totally foreign land?

Well, there most certainly are, and what's more, those humble booths have now become mega-organised conventions.

Enter the Emigration Fair 2007, just held in March 10-11 this year in The Netherlands.

"Exhibitions and free presentations from experts in a variety of related fields provide visitors and fellow exhibitors with a copious amount of resources - plus a wealth of free materials - about all aspects of emigrant life worldwide. Every year thousands of people are leaving the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany in search of a new life abroad.

If you are considering starting a new future in another country, in Europe, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, Australia, the United States, Scandinavia or Asia you need all the information you can get! For a complete overview of the Emigration process don't miss the Emigration Fair on March 10 and 11, in the Home Boxx Exhibition Centre Nieuwegein/Utrecht, in the heart of the Netherlands just 100km away from Belgium and Germany."

Ahh, convenient. Belgium, The Netherlands, and Germany. I daresay even the French could make a day trip over to Utrecht for the day, and a good many others beside.

This startling fair was brought to my attention by my blogger colleague, Pieter Dorsman of Peaktalk, who has led the way in Dutch blogging about the topic, going on many years now.

In fact, he just wrote a blogpiece called "Time To Leave" for Pajamas Media, regarding this fair, and moreover, the reasons which made this emigration fair such a hit, drawing "record crowds".

Pieter conjectures that the "market" has sensed a growing disatisfaction from many Dutchmen and women, and is simply filling a much-needed void.

And this brings me to their one-time countryman, Amsterdam favourite son, Baruch Spinoza, who has sadly been forgotten by too many.

He of course once wrote this famous line, "Nature abhors a vacuum"...

...and oh how that is true in almost every facet of human life.

Back in the days of the modest emigration booths, I am sure many Europeans who didn't make the journey over, were frankly happy and relieved, as assuredly as they were a touch envious of those who sought to change their fortunes, in another clime.

Nature abhors a vacuum, but human beings know an opportunity when they see one.

Less people makes for more land, more jobs to be had, and more opportunities that might have been filled had those emigrants decided to stay.

Today, the situation is a little different, because as we all know, it's a small world, and it is due to technology.

No more will we see cargoes of tear-stained immigrants waving hankies to their families at the docks, who they leave behind in the Old World, for many, never to see kith and kin ever again in their lifetimes.

With the merest touch of a button today, you can call or communicate with anyone and anywhere in this world, and oftentimes, you don't even have to pay for it.

Just use your computer, and hey presto! you're talking to nonna or Oma back home.

You can watch your favourite television shows via satellite, you can read online gossip from the rags you used to read on the train, and if you feel homesick for your native food, you can pop down to the supermarket, and pick up Thai noodles, or pasta, or feijão, or anything you want, all because this world is not the world of Ellis Island immigrants anymore.

So obviously immigration wouldn't feel as painful to Europeans now, as it certainly did then, right?

Wrong.

Here's a secret which you may not know, especially if you're a North American reading this.

Europeans are highly sensitive when it comes to emigration.

When Americans laud their melting pot society, implicit in that equation is that they left for a better place, to make a better life for themselves.

So tell me, what does that make the place they left, and especially, the people who didn't leave?

Exactly -- by inference, it makes those people less intrepid, less courageous, and definitely, less lucky.

Now just imagine how those in Europe feel when they think of this.

Nothing is ever said out loud you understand, but for every American who visits his grandpapa's old city in Italy, who arrives thinking that he'll be greeted like a long lost cousin, and finds out there is oft suspicion, and resentment awaiting him, you'll understand that this syndrome is at work.

Sure, some may laugh at this contention, but what is emigration at the end of the day, but a EMPIRICAL rejection of the life, culture, and nation you left behind?

If you're an immigrant reading this, as assuredly as I am an immigrant writing this, you'll have in your mind many reasons why you emigrated, in the first place.

Some will say that there were no economic opportunities back home.

Some will say that they fell in love with a man or woman from another country, and decided to move to their country instead of bringing their loved one to theirs.

Some will say that their country is FANTASTIC...culturally. But that for reasons of freedom of expression, political realities, or openness of society, their hand was forced. It wasn't their choice to leave, but they had to.

Almost all will probably say that my words of "rejection" are overblown.

But it's not, and if those immigrants reading this are honest with themselves, even if they cannot admit it publicly in the comments section, their leaving their country is a rejection of their country, pure and simple.

By immigration you are in effect rejecting the country of your birth, and that of your ancestors' births, of possibly thousands of years.

For WHATEVER reason, you judged that your country was not able to sustain you or your family anymore, and you decided to forcibly remove yourself from it.

Your life trajectory is different from your fellow countrymen for all time afterwards, even if you return to your homeland at some point to live.

Why? Because by removing yourself physically, you didn't undergo the same day-to-day cultural upheavals, economic or political travails your country had, in the meantime.

For example, take those Italians or Germans who emigrated to Brazil.

They missed two World Wars, hyper-inflation, Fascism, Nazism, and the ignominous defeat in war of their countries with all that means to the national psyche.

And North Americans expect to come back to their ancestral homestead, and be greeted with open arms?

Come on. Who are you kidding?

Of course you will be thought of almost as a traitor, no matter what your leaving meant in terms of opportunities left behind for those who remained.

This brings us back to the Utrecht Emigration Fair, held just this March.

The Ellis Island European immigrant was usually illiterate, and doubtlessly poor back home. The new Dutch immigrant, as well as the Belgian, German ones, are anything but that.

They are finely educated, multilingual, well-travelled, and well-heeled.

Even pretending that they these Europeans are all working-class for a moment, it's a working-class unlike any of any previous generation before it.

So what gives? Why are these people leaving?

Pieter elucidates.

"Less reliable figures are being presented when it comes to determining why so many feel it is time to vote with their feet. A random survey of the recent news reports makes it clear that in terms of negatives the Dutch have basically got it all: high population density, an over-regulated society, a significant tax burden, soaring crime rates, a general sense of ‘dilapidation’ and a huge unintegrated pool of Muslim immigrants.

While they’ve had little influence over inheriting a relatively small plot of land, it is the vast expansion of a powerful and omnipresent public behemoth that appears to be at the root of most of the nation’s current problems. And for its origins we probably have to go back to the sixties and seventies."

(Ugh, I hate the 60s and 70s for precisely this reason -- its marauding lack of concern with a bureaucracy which gobbles up everything, and substitutes itself for "civilisation")

He continues with this startling information about immigration reform.

"Not only maximum security felons were able to get a great deal and the opportunity to re-offend. Earlier this month Dutch press reported that since 2005 some 3,400 immigrant youths - notably Moroccans and Cape Verdians - had been treated to vacations back to their home countries to ‘reconnect with their culture’ in the bizarre hope that such a trip to the sunny south would minimize their chances to re-offend. Of course, the Dutch taxpayer has kindly footed the bill leaving some commentators to note that in America the holidaying offenders would probably have ended up on a chain gang."

Chain gang -- perhaps not, but certainly the American taxpayer wouldn't be footing a bill so that young violent Mexican youths (as one example) could go back to Mexico, to 'reacquaint' themselves with their culture, in the hopes that...well, who knows.

Maybe in the hopes that they will integrate themselves at long last and become productive members of society, something which takes time (and will to do so). How exactly, I'm not sure, but perhaps they are implying that to know the culture from whence you sprang, means you'll take more pride in yourself, and transfer that confidence into your new homeland.

Little does this Euro-bureaucracy understand, or wills itself to understand, that this is precisely the kind of 'fed-up-to-here' attitude your average Dutchman would have, in what they might think is trying to mollycoddle a segment of their society, and on their dime no less.

Immigration is a devilish thing, and it's down to each person and their personality to make it work, but ultimately, it's an individual reaction entirely.

That's why you have success stories of immigrants, alongside horror stories of alienation.

But take away all the reasons he provides in these two paragraphs, and you are still left with many of the same reasons as the ones present in 19th century Europe.

At the end of the day, people will leave everything they know and love, even their families, because they are dissatisfied with their country, plain and simple.

Of course, immigration is not static.

The Dutch, for example, emigrated in record numbers proportionally, to Australia, back in the 1960s. That's also true of all the other European nationalities, such as the ever-travelling Italians, who left for Canada at exactly the same time.

The time of the guestworker then was nigh, and the collapse of the old empires also left their old colonisers with a debt of conscience which many immigrants exploited for their own ends.

Today, therefore, the New World is much the same (chock-a-block with teeming international masses still yearning to be free), but the Old World is completely different.

So the sounds of the newest vacuum you hear in Europe, are being made not by the newest arrivals, but by those whose ancestors have a blood claim to their homeland going on thousands of years.

It is they who look around, see a changed nation, with a cowering YET overarching bureaucracy, a deflated economy, violence, grime, and hatred no matter how many social welfare programmes are available, who decide to finally, at long last, join those other Europeans who made the trek out so many years ago.

Inside themselves, they know they are rejecting their homeland. They are less embarrassed to admit it.

Because in their case, they feel those who stay are the ones who are betraying their way of life by tolerating from many of their immigrant populations, what would be intolerable to anyone else had the rot of political correctness not set in.

In short, instead of betraying their country, in some way, those who leave feel that their country has let THEM down, by compromising on things which simply cannot be compromised.

Unlike Pieter though, who I have noticed tends towards the downhearted in his predictions about the Old World, I think Europe will be fine in the long run.

Something will happen, as yet unforseen, to make people understand that a nation which gives up on its native people, is giving up more than just their authenticity.

They are literally ceding way to another culture not in the hopes of integration, but of eradication, and losing their own in the process, thus allowing more than a vacuum to form, but a yawning chasm.

But at the end of the day, Europeans know that deep inside, where the heart of political correct darkness dares not to raise its ugly head, and they will do something about it.

They must.

Lands must continue have to have ancestors, not just descendants.


RELATED

Multi-Culturalism

My Immigration Experience

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

30 Short Dick




It's a restaurant bill, or facture as the French have it, from the most Eurotrash of all "in" ski resorts -- Verbier.

Speaking of waiters, the garçon apparently is one Gregory, not Grégoire, if you please. The bill is written out in Swiss francs, with convenient Euro conversion below it -- a walloping total over 500 for a party of 4.

No wonder I stick to Megève.

Some of the items are delicious such as jambon fumée (smoked ham), fondue tomate, and a very recognisable banana split. Let's not forget that Champortay just sitting there, mocking us for our love of "le champagne Americain" (water).

But then there is the enigmatic "30 Short Dick". And you know what?

Your guess is as good as mine -- but mine's probably filthy.

Labels: , ,


 




Advertise on blogs
British Expat Blog Directory.